August 15, 2005

Backlash Spreading

For illegals, a spreading backlash

CALDWELL, IDAHO – This oasis of irrigated farm country in the high desert is a long way from the US-Mexico border, and even farther from the nation's capital, but it represents America's new battleground on immigration policy.

Here county commissioner Robert Vasquez is trying to do what he says Washington won't: crack down on illegal immigration. He recently sued several local employers in a novel bid to use federal anticorruption law to prevent hiring illegals.

Mr. Vasquez's controversial crusade is part of a larger pattern. As the border continues to be punctured by illicit crossings, and as immigrants spread to places unaccustomed to or unprepared for the influx, a local backlash is building.

[....]

Vasquez, whose grandfather came from Mexico, complains of an "unarmed invasion" that is fast transforming American towns like this one. "Why," he asks, "should I have to 'Press 1 for English?' "

But if cultural change is a key backdrop of the debate, both sides frame their views largely around economic arguments.

On that score, many here support the effort to clamp down on illegal laborers.

"They say these are jobs that no one else will take," says Tim Smallwood, an Idaho fruit and vegetable inspector, as he takes a lunch break in Caldwell. But if employers were denied that pool of cheap labor, overall wages would go up he says.

Lori Morrison, who manages a night shift at Jack-in-the-Box to help support her family, shares the worry about wages. And she adds another concern: the social-service burden on government. "Taxes have gone up," she says. "They're killing us."

[....]

But there's still plenty of fuel for local backlashes like the one Vasquez leads.

A new CBS poll finds that two-thirds of Americans oppose guest-worker permits for those who are now here illegally. And in a June Gallup survey, 70 percent said the US shouldn't make it easier for illegal immigrants to become citizens.

Those opinions have hardened into action in some states and localities:

• In New Hampshire, police arrested alleged illegal immigrants using a state law on "criminal trespass." A judge is expected to rule soon on a bid to dismiss the charges.

• In Arizona, voters approved a November ballot measure denying some public benefits to illegal immigrants. This week a federal appeals court upheld the law.

• In 18 states from California to Minnesota and Tennessee, groups have sprung up with affiliations to the Minuteman Project, which coordinated a highly publicized volunteer effort earlier this year to patrol Arizona's border with Mexico.

Posted by Ithildin at August 15, 2005 12:48 PM | PROCURE FINE OLD WORLD ABSINTHE

Considering the NH judge dismissed all charges and then allowed the illiegal "criminal" aliens to walk out of the court (instead of into immigration's hands for deportation) I doubt this will go anywhere. Face it - until we start voting the jerks out - politicians are not going to take the concerns of legal American's seriously on this issue.

All incentives for breaking the immigration law needs to be withdraw - automatic citizenship for children of illegals, education benefits, free health care, welfare, subsidized housing, even citizenship offers for illegals already here - all of it needs to go. Until the "rights" of lawful residents and lawful immigrant applicants are placed above the rights of "illegal" criminal aliens who snub our immigration laws, nothing will change.

Posted by: Roberta at August 15, 2005 3:28 PM

Roberta, I agree with your sentiments and MOST of your suggestions, but it's hard to see how one can prevent children of illegals from becoming citizens, unless you're proposing to amend the Constitution: as things stand now, under the 14th Amendment, if you're 1) born in the US and 2) "subject to the jurisidiction thereof" (i.e., not the child of someone with diplomatic immunity), then you're a citizen.

Posted by: Dave J at August 15, 2005 4:43 PM

Dave, I am suggesting amending the constitution. A number of countries have done it or considered it recently. Including Ireland. Basically, if you are not a citizen or legally resident here - your offspring should not be given citizenship. Since our courts believe in looking to "international" law and opinion, why can't we follow suit?

Removing incentives is the only way to start to resolve the problems. This may also help the medical crisis along the border states. OB practice is the highest medical premium and malpractice area in medicine. With Doctors leaving right and left and illegals crossing just to give birth- at our expense - and often requiring "extra' neo-natal care, the border states are closing hospitals and losing OB's faster then the nation - thus endagering "legal" residents needing care.

Posted by: Roberta at August 16, 2005 8:26 PM