I didn't realize such a liturgy had existed in my church.
The Church of England is being accused by a leading bishop of sexualising friendship. The charge is levelled by the Bishop of Lincoln, the Rt Rev John Saxbee. Yet centuries ago, the church officially recognised "sworn friends" who would participate in a liturgy specially devised for the purpose, the bishop says. And in the new issue of The Lincoln Bulletin, his diocesan magazine, he gives as an example a 14th century prayer which said: “Send your holy angel upon these your servants, N and N, that they may love each other, as your holy Apostles Peter and Paul, and Andrew and James, and John and Thomas ... not through the bonds of birth, but through faith and by the love of the Holy Spirit, that they may abide in the same love all the days of their life."Bishop Saxbee says: "Sadly, such respect for friendship as a faithful commitment made between a man and a woman, or between two people of the same gender, no longer finds expression in our repertoire of pastoral services. "One reason is that the Church has succumbed to the current tendency to sexualise friendship, so that any prayers said to support or celebrate a committed friendship, say, between two men or two women are assumed to be promoting homosexuality."
The bishop describes this situation as "so sad" because in the Bible friendship is something to be celebrated "as the image of God's faithfulness and commitment" and the church through the centuries has "offered opportunities for such Christian friendship to be prayerfully supported and celebrated."
I agree with the Bishop, it does seem that the trend is to sexualize relationships. There's almost always the assumption that Nin and I are in a sexual relationship. That's why we started introducing each other as "my sister" -- it was just easier. But I do like the term "sworn friends", because that's what we are. I've always mentally used the term Anne used in "Anne of Green Gables": kindred spirits :) I wish the service described in the article was something still being performed, because I'd love to be able to participate in it.
Posted by Ithildin at July 28, 2005 12:33 PM | PROCURE FINE OLD WORLD ABSINTHE
I love them too.
Since she's sort of a cross between a daughter and a sister to me -- in addition to best friend -- the whole idea is just "EWWW!" :)
Posted by: Ith at July 28, 2005 1:04 PMRemember - lesbian vampire cult! Open to non-lesbians and non-vampires, also.
You'd think the first thought would be roommates - with costs being what they are and all. Heck, my mind is constantly in the gutter and that's what I would have thought first.
Posted by: eviltammy at July 28, 2005 6:44 PMHmmmm....
I guess I must be off base of the usual thinking
then. I am not trying to pat myself on the back here...I just never assumed that you and Nin were anything but friends.
To use eviltammy's expression ( slightly modified ) Yes, my mind is in the gutter quite often. However, all I thought was the last phrase in the above paragraph.
Posted by: Robert at July 28, 2005 7:47 PMRobert, I'm not sure what our blog readers think :) I was talking more about RL situations. It may also be because we live in an area of CA that skews 'alternative' , so it colours people's perceptions.
Posted by: Ith at July 29, 2005 8:51 AMReminds me of those who've tried to assert that Holmes and Watson were homosexual lovers.
What I really find ironic is that because of the gay community's battle for acceptance, people tend to be MORE suspicious that other people are homosexual. I am not married and don't date, and I've been asked on occasion if I'm gay because of that. I think that a few decades ago, that idea wouldn't have even crossed anybody's mind. Instead, they would simply have thought, "He's fat and bad-tempered. No wonder he's not married."
Posted by: docjim505 at July 29, 2005 10:21 AMIth,
As I've mentioned before, one of the odd things that struck me when I re-entered into single life in my 40s was the institutionalization of the difference between "relationship" and "friendship". Various women friends would take about their past or current "relationships", by which they meant people they had s*x with, as distinct from their "friends", which didn't. Whenever I hear that distinction, I'm struck by how sad it must be for them to acknowledge that the people with whom they are most intimate are not "friends".
I fear that our culture has lost the basic idea of "friendship" in much the same way that it has lost the basic idea of "modesty."
One reason for this may be that we've also lost the idea of "virtue." What informed the liturgy you describe, and the also idea of "kindred spirits", was a deeply Aristotelian sense that true friendship exists between people who share a common commitment to an idea of the good.
Aristotle spends one chapter in his Nichomanichian Ethics on the idea of friendship - and I believe he is the only philosopher to ever spend any time on "friendship" - because he believes that friendship is essential to living the virtuous life. He felt that a friend is a mirror in whom we see the person we ought to be and who reflects back to us the truth about who we are, whether good and bad.
Obviously, for moderns who believe that "friendship" really means "relationships" which really means "s*x partner", the "friendship liturgy" is really about gay marriage. But the original understanding was truly much more profound.
Posted by: Peter Sean Bradley at July 29, 2005 10:41 AMHear hear! to all the comments! And I love that there is a liturgy for that sort of thing. Its a shame that whenever we come across deep friendships in literature (hello! LOTR!!! M&C) and past histories, everyone nowadays sniggers and goes "yeah, right" and yet, I think that is what the world is sadly sadly lacking nowadays.
Peter - you hve the right of it. I am married, and have no intentions of rejoining singlehood, but it often baffles me that my single female friends have this compartmentalisation going on in their heads, as if friends and intimacy could not have anything to do with each other. Yet, one of the reasons I married my husband was because I knew I could trust him to be as good a friend as a lover to me. I trusted him because of our friendship.
Posted by: sharon ferguson at July 29, 2005 11:00 AMI like the term "covenant friends"
Posted by: debbie at July 29, 2005 11:48 AMI'm so glad you posted this.
What the bishop said is true, and in our highly sexualized society it will only become moreso.
It is good to know that some people still believe that true love, apart from sex, can exist.
I've always mentally used the term Anne used in "Anne of Green Gables": kindred spirits :)
Yes, that's a perfect term for it (I love those books).
There's too much cynicism around nowadays--that's why people can't accept the setup with you and Nin. "Oh sure they're just friends, sure they are," is the underlying thought process, if one can even call it that.
It's a shame, and it's probably devalued many otherwise promising friendships.
Posted by: ilyka at July 28, 2005 12:59 PM